Features

Everything a deal team does in diligence, run by an AI that sees the whole deal.

Other tools organize around the data room. MergerGod organizes around your thesis, and never loses it. Here is what it does at every stage.

Read everything

Reads the entire data room, not just the easy files.

Upload from any VDR. MergerGod reads every file, every common format, including the scanned ones nobody opens, and writes its own diligence requests as it finds the gaps.

  • Every function: financial, commercial, legal, technical, people
  • Auto-generated follow-ups for what is missing or unclear
  • Nothing skimmed because the deadline came first
1,206 documents read78 processing
of 1,284 in the room · across 5 functions
62 diligence requestsAuto
generated from gaps found in the room
Ask first

Asks the questions you didn't know to ask.

A chat box can only answer what you already knew to ask. MergerGod generates the questions the best acquirers would ask about this specific deal, drawn from the Buyer-Led framework and hundreds of practitioner interviews.

  • Generated from your thesis, not a generic checklist
  • Phased so thesis-critical comes before confirmatory
  • Every question traceable to the pillar it protects
Split of true recurring ARR vs one-time fees?Critical
serves · the $14M ARR is real and durable
Who owns customer data rights at change of control?Critical
serves · the capability is a portable asset
How concentrated is model knowledge on the team?Watch
serves · the capability is a portable asset
Thread to thesis

Every finding tied back to why you're buying.

Set your thesis once. MergerGod organizes the entire read around your pillars, so you see what confirms the deal and what challenges it, not a flat list of observations.

  • Findings mapped to thesis pillars in real time
  • Severity from named thresholds, shown on the finding
  • Pillar health updates as diligence lands
Durable Retention1 risk
concentration finding threaded here
Founder & CultureChallenged
no retention package found
Market ConsolidationHolding
clean cap table, no blocking CoC
See across functions

Catches what falls between your advisors.

Human diligence runs in silos. Finance reads the financials, legal reads the contracts, and nobody holds both at once. MergerGod holds the whole deal, so the connection surfaces as one finding instead of two reports nobody reconciled.

  • Patterns, anomalies, and dependencies across workstreams
  • Third-party reports read against the whole room
  • Contradictions between advisor deliverables surfaced
Finance · 64% of ARR in the top 3 accountsCritical
ARR_by_Customer.xlsx · p.4
Legal · change-of-control consent, largest accountCritical
MSA_Northwind_2021.pdf · §14.2
Same customer. One finding.Linked
no single function held both facts at once
Verify

Cross-referenced across models, so you see what it missed.

Every material finding is read by more than one model. Where they agree, confidence is high. Where they diverge, MergerGod routes it to you instead of quietly picking an answer. The disagreement is the signal.

  • Independent reads, surfaced side by side
  • Divergences flagged for a human decision
  • Verified-clean areas shown, because that is a finding too
Model AModel BDiverged
Deferred revenue: one reads it clean, one flags $1.2M as possible pull-forward
91% agreement45 clean
3 divergences routed to you
Carry it to close

The agreement terms and the integration plan, on one thread.

Every material risk maps to the protection it requires in the agreement, assembled while you can still negotiate it. And the integration plan builds as findings land, before deal sensitivity even lets you staff it.

  • Each risk mapped to a term, ready before legal starts
  • Anything that can't be protected is flagged before signing
  • Integration plan owned, with a date, before close
§ Retention-linked earnoutDrafted
covers the concentration risk · ready for counsel
§ TSA scheduleOpen
held open until the seller returns scope
90-day key-account retention planOwned
owner named · starts day one
Decide & defend

Living readouts, every line sourced.

Spin up an IC brief or a status view that refreshes as the deal moves. Every line traces to its source, so it holds up in front of an investment committee.

  • IC brief, counsel issues list, integration handoff, or custom
  • Auto-refreshes as new documents land
  • Export to deck, doc, or PDF with citations intact
IC briefCurrent
verdict, material findings, all sourced · updated 2m ago
Diligence status3 open
47 of 62 requests resolved
Compound

It gets sharper every deal.

After close, MergerGod tracks how its calls aged and feeds the outcomes back. A private record of what got flagged, what you decided, and how it turned out that no generic tool can build.

  • Post-close checkpoints on every tracked call
  • An honest track record, including the misses
  • Your record stays yours, never pooled across buyers
Concentration earnoutHeld
accounts retained · protection worked
Tech-debt estimateRan heavy
recalibrates scoring for re-platforms
Two modes

Ask it anything. Or let it run the deal.

Both, wired together. Every question you ask feeds the plan it is already building.

Ask

Ask the room anything.

Pull any answer in seconds, every claim cited to the source. The fast, prompt-and-answer surface you already expect.

Drive

It is already working.

Point it at the room and it runs diligence against your thesis, surfacing the calls that need you instead of waiting to be asked.

It never waits to be asked, and it never drops the thread.

Why it holds up

The models are commodity. The judgment is the product.

Every tool can read a room now. Five layers above the model are why a MergerGod finding holds up in front of a committee.

01
Methodology as code. Buyer-Led M&A encoded as named, inspectable rules, not a prompt.
02
The practitioner corpus. Thousands of passages of real deal precedent, cited on the recommendation.
03
The thread. Every output traces from thesis to evidence to decision to outcome.
04
Verification. A second, independent model re-derives every material finding.
05
The calibration record. Every call graded against what actually happened after close.
Live today
  • Reads the entire room, threaded to your thesis
  • Question generation from the Buyer-Led framework
  • Two-model verification, cited to the source
  • Agreement mapping and integration planning
  • Living readouts and post-close grading
On its way
  • Deal documents drafted: NDA, LOI, and the terms behind the agreement
  • Quality-of-earnings analysis, and a cross-read of the one you were handed
  • A dollar impact on every finding, into price and structure
  • Native VDR connections, beyond direct upload
Why it matters

The vision is the whole deal, in one thread. This page only claims what we can show you today. Everything else is the thread, still unfolding.

See it on your own deal.

Start free, or book a walkthrough with the team.